{"id":4742,"date":"2012-02-15T11:13:03","date_gmt":"2012-02-15T16:13:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/?page_id=4742"},"modified":"2024-07-03T19:47:28","modified_gmt":"2024-07-03T23:47:28","slug":"schedule-shannon-lectures-2011","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/shannon-lecture\/shannon-lectures-2011\/schedule-shannon-lectures-2011\/","title":{"rendered":"Schedule &#8211; Shannon Lectures (2011)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<section class=\"w-screen px-6 cu-section cu-section--white ml-offset-center md:px-8 lg:px-14\">\n    <div class=\"space-y-6 cu-max-w-child-5xl  md:space-y-10 cu-prose-first-last\">\n\n            <div class=\"cu-textmedia flex flex-col lg:flex-row mx-auto gap-6 md:gap-10 my-6 md:my-12 first:mt-0 max-w-5xl\">\n        <div class=\"justify-start cu-textmedia-content cu-prose-first-last\" style=\"flex: 0 0 100%;\">\n            <header class=\"font-light prose-xl cu-pageheader md:prose-2xl cu-component-updated cu-prose-first-last\">\n                                    <h1 class=\"cu-prose-first-last font-semibold !mt-2 mb-4 md:mb-6 relative after:absolute after:h-px after:bottom-0 after:bg-cu-red after:left-px text-3xl md:text-4xl lg:text-5xl lg:leading-[3.5rem] pb-5 after:w-10 text-cu-black-700 not-prose\">\n                        Schedule &#8211; Shannon Lectures (2011)\n                    <\/h1>\n                \n                                \n                            <\/header>\n\n                    <\/div>\n\n            <\/div>\n\n    <\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n<h3 id=\"all-lectures-begin-at-1300-in-room-303-paterson-hall-carleton-university-reception-to-follow\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">All lectures begin at 13:00 in room 303 Paterson Hall, Carleton University. Reception to follow.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\"><strong>September 23, 2011<\/strong><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>KEITH OATLEY, \u201cEmotions in literary history, and the history of emotions.\u201d<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>Abstract:<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Although many written historical records are of disputes (including wars), accessions to power, laws, commercial transactions, and so on, to understand the history of emotions, other kinds of writings become relevant: the writings of fiction. It would be an exaggeration to say that fiction is all about the emotions, but not much of an exaggeration. Literary writings from, say, The epic of Gilgamesh to J.M. Coetzee&#8217;s Disgrace afford glimpses of the emotional life of individuals and societies in history. Some emotional themes, for instance of friendship and of interpersonal and intergroup antagonisms, persist. With other themes, such as the nature of love, there seem to have been changes. Also changed over time are concern for, and empathy with, others. I discuss the nature and stability of such themes in relation to questions of emotions&#8217; universality and cultural construction, and the issue of how far emotions have been significant in the history of societies.<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div><strong>September 30, 2011<\/strong><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>FRANK BIESS, &#8220;German Angst? Fear and Democracy in Postwar Germany.&#8221;<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>Abstract:<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">The lecture addresses an apparent paradox: while West Germans experienced increasing economic prosperity and political stabilization in the postwar period, they also went through recurring cycles of intense fear and anxiety. This proclivity to fear and anxiety gave rise to the notion of a distinct German angst, which was not just projected onto Germans from the outside but was also part of postwar Germans\u2019 own self-observation. Drawing on a newly conceptualized history of emotions, the lecture traces the shifting objects of fear and anxiety after 1945, and it examines the changing cultural norms for expressing emotions in the postwar period. It also seeks to answer the question: what was the relationship between fear and democratization in postwar Germany?<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\"><strong>October 14, 2011<\/strong><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>SARITA SRIVASTAVA, \u201cTears, Fears and Careers: &nbsp;Emotional Encounters about Race.\u201d<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>Abstract:<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">What do emotion and race have to do with one another? &nbsp; A number of historical analyses have described both the psychic investments in racial hierarchies and the psychic effects of racial oppression (Roediger 1991, Stoler 1995, McClintock 1995, Said 1979, Fanon &nbsp;1967). &nbsp;These deep emotional undercurrents of racial conflict are reflected in the anger, fear and nostalgia that accompany contemporary discussions of racism, anti-racism and multiculturalism, particularly in organizational settings. &nbsp;An analysis of feminist debates over the last three decades shows that &nbsp;normative practices of emotional disclosure and expression often deflect, personalize and derail attempts at anti-racist organizational change.<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div><strong>October 21, 2011<\/strong><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>BARBARA ROSENWEIN, \u201cEmotions: Embodied or Incorporeal?\u201d<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>Abstract:<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Alain de Lille long ago proclaimed that gestures and facial expressions were windows onto a person\u2019s \u201cinternal disposition,\u201d while today Paul Ekman claims that certain facial expressions represent \u201cbasic emotions.\u201d &nbsp;However, as this paper argues, in fact associations between the body and emotion are (and remain) highly variable. The paper treats emotions within the context of \u201cemotional communities\u201d&#8211; social groups within which people are animated by common or similar interests, values, and emotional styles. &nbsp;Emotional communities have different ways of incorporating (or not) the body in emotional expression. &nbsp;This point is exemplified by three medieval examples. &nbsp;The paper ends by suggesting that such variations in embodiment help challenge the view of \u201cuniversal\u201d emotions.<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\"><strong>October 28, 2011<\/strong><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>WILLIAM IAN MILLER, \u201cI can\u2019t get no satisfaction: revenge and some small portion of its sentiments.\u201d<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>Abstract: &nbsp; TBA<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\"><strong>November 11, 2011<\/strong><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>BRUCE CURTIS,&nbsp;&#8220;&#8216;Death, Ham, Mustard, and the Blues&#8221; : Emotion as Performance&#8221;<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>Abstract:<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Peter C. Muir\u2019s recent account of the emergence and interaction of popular and folk blues in turn-of-the-twentieth century America relates their form, content and function to \u2018neurasthenia\u2019, the commonly discussed malady of the age. He treats the music as a homeopathic and an allopathic remedy for the complaint. He draws intriguing parallels with the music of such composers as John Dowland in an earlier \u2018age of melancholy.\u2019 Perhaps Muir\u2019s analysis of music offers a way to give substance to Raymond Williams\u2019 intriguing but elusive concept, \u2018structure of feeling,\u2019 which was intended as a means of coming to grips with the emotional resonances provoked by phases of capitalist cultural transformation. In this exploratory paper, I seek to juxtapose such accounts of cultural expression and structured emotional life to more \u2018figurational\u2019 and \u2018game-theoretic\u2019 analyses of the kind proposed by Norbert Elias and Pierre Bourdieu. The paper draws some of its empirical materials from the archive of recorded pre-1940 blues. Alan Lomax\u2019s 1938 Library of Congress recordings of Jelly Roll Morton provide the first half of my title.<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div><strong>November 18, 2011<\/strong><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>LAURA BRANDON, \u201cCause and Affect: War Art and Emotion.\u201d<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div>Abstract:<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">In 2006, the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) launched a television series called The Power of Art. Historian and Art Historian Simon Schama selected eight famous artists and in the context of their lives and times explored the creation of several significant compositions, arguing that the artists\u2019 works not only changed the course of art history but, in some cases, profoundly altered public understanding of events in their own time and after. As writer Frances Spalding notes of the Picasso chapter in her October 2006 Independent review of the accompanying book, \u201cWhen in February 2003 the United Nations Security Council decided to hold a press conference about the likelihood of armed intervention in Iraq, someone noticed that hanging in the chosen location was a tapestry reproduction of Guernica, with its burning houses, screaming women and dead babies. It was hurriedly covered over with a sky-blue UN drape. Schama is not alone is seeing this as the ultimate backhanded compliment to the power of art.\u201d In considering emotional theories I explore this so-called power of art in a Canadian context. I look into the circumstances that led artist Gertrude Kearns to paint What They Gave, a 2006 Afghanistan war composition, and assess its impact. I ask whether the artist\u2019s emotional response to the tragedy she witnessed is conveyed in paint and, moreover, question whether viewers respond directly to the work or if other information sources play a greater role in determining their emotional reactions.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>All lectures begin at 13:00 in room 303 Paterson Hall, Carleton University. Reception to follow. September 23, 2011 KEITH OATLEY, \u201cEmotions in literary history, and the history of emotions.\u201d Abstract: Although many written historical records are of disputes (including wars), accessions to power, laws, commercial transactions, and so on, to understand the history of emotions, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":4714,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_cu_dining_location_slug":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"cu_page_type":[303],"class_list":["post-4742","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","cu_page_type-general"],"acf":{"cu_post_thumbnail":false},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4742","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4742"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4742\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12549,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4742\/revisions\/12549"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"cu_page_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/history\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cu_page_type?post=4742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}