{"id":141,"date":"2017-05-17T11:49:00","date_gmt":"2017-05-17T15:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/?page_id=141"},"modified":"2021-10-14T23:19:52","modified_gmt":"2021-10-15T03:19:52","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ewanation, L., Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (in press). Mock juror decision-making in a self-defence trial involving police use of force. <i>Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; McManus, L. (in press).\u00a0 Mosaic or melting pot?: Race and juror decision-making in Canada and the United States. <i>Journal of Interpersonal Violence<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Ewanation, L., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2021). The interactive effects of race and expert testimony on jurors\u2019 perceptions of recanted confessions. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 12<\/i>, 699077.<\/p>\n<p>Yamamoto, S., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2021).\u00a0 What\u2019s in the box?: Punishment and insanity in the Canadian jury deliberation room.\u00a0 <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 12, <\/i>2442.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., Yamamoto, S., &amp; McLaughlin, K. (2020).\u00a0 The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity defence trials.\u00a0 <i>International Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 68, <\/i>101536.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (2019).\u00a0 Social Identity Theory in the Canadian courtroom:\u00a0 Effects of juror and defendant race. <i>Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 61, <\/i>24-44.<\/p>\n<p>Yamamoto, S., Maeder, E.M., Mossiere, A., &amp; Brown, D. (2019).\u00a0 The influence of defendant body size and defendant gender on mock juror decision-making. <i>Cogent Psychology, 6<\/i>, 1674091.<\/p>\n<p>Yamamoto, S., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2019). Creating and validating a measure of punishment orientation.\u00a0 <i>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45<\/i>, 1283-1294<i>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (2019).\u00a0 Investigating race salience, defendant race, and victim race on juror decision-making in Canada.\u00a0 <i>Justice Quarterly, 36<\/i> (5), 929-953.<\/p>\n<p>Ewanation, L., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2018).\u00a0 The influence of eyewitness intoxication, eyewitness race, and defendant race on mock juror decision-making. <i>Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60, <\/i>505-536.<\/p>\n<p>Mossiere, A., Maeder, E.M., &amp; Pica, E. (2018).\u00a0 Racial composition of couples in battered spouse syndrome cases: A look at juror perceptions and decisions.\u00a0 <i>Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33<\/i>(18), 2867-2890.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; Ewanation, L. (2018).\u00a0 What makes race salient?: Juror decision-making in same-race vs. cross-race identification scenarios and the influence of expert testimony.\u00a0 <i>Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45<\/i>(8), 1234-1251.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., Yamamoto, S., &amp; McManus, L.A. (2018).\u00a0 Methodology matters: Comparing sample types and data collection methods in a juror decision-making study on the influence of defendant race.\u00a0 <i>Psychology, Crime, and Law, 24,<\/i> 687-702.<\/p>\n<p>McManus, L., Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (2018).\u00a0 The role of defendant race and racially charged media in Canadian mock juror decision making. <i>Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60<\/i>(2), 266-295.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., McManus, L., Yamamoto, S., &amp; McLaughlin, K. (2018).\u00a0 A test of gender-crime congruency on mock juror decision-making. <i>Cogent Psychology, 5<\/i>(1), 1461543.<\/p>\n<p>Yamamoto, S., Fenwick, K., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2017).\u00a0 Criminal responsibility in Canada: Mental illness stigma education and the insanity defense.\u00a0 <i>International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16<\/i>(4), 313-335.\u00a0 http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/14999013.2017.1391357<\/p>\n<p>Yamamoto, S., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2017).\u00a0 A case of culture: Defendant gender and juror decision-making.\u00a0 <i>Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32<\/i>(20)<i>,<\/i> 3090-3110<i>.<\/i>\u00a0 doi:10.1177\/0886260515596976<\/p>\n<p>Yamamoto, S., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2017).\u00a0 Defendant and juror race in a necessity case: An ultimate attribution error.\u00a0 <i>Journal of Ethnicity and Criminal Justice, 15<\/i>(3), 270-284.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (2017).\u00a0 Attributions in the courtroom: The influence of race, incentive, and witness type on jurors&#8217; perceptions of secondary confessions.\u00a0 <i>Psychology, Crime, &amp; Law, 23<\/i>, 361-375.<\/p>\n<p>Ewanation, L., Yamamoto, S., Monnink, J., &amp; Maeder, E. M. (2017). Perceived realism and the CSI-effect.\u00a0<em>Cogent\u00a0Social Sciences 3<\/em>(1), 1294446. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23311886.2017.1294446<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E. M., McManus, L. A., McLaughlin, K. J., Yamamoto, S., &amp; Stewart, H. (2016). Jurors&#8217; perceptions of scientific testimony: The role of gender and testimony complexity in trials involving DNA evidence.\u00a0<em>Cogent Psychology 3<\/em>(1), 1264657. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23311908.2016.1264657<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (2016). Attributions in the courtroom: The influence of race, incentive, and witness type on jurors\u2019 perceptions of secondary confessions.\u00a0<em>Psychology, Crime &amp; Law 23<\/em>(4), 361-375.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E., Yamamoto, S., Zannella, L. (2016). Putting negative attitudes on the agenda? Not Criminally Responsible Reform Act publicity and juror decision-making.\u00a0<em>International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 49<\/em>(A), 154-159.<\/p>\n<p>Mossiere, A., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2016). Juror decision-making in NCRMD trials: Effects of gender and mental illness type.\u00a0<em>International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 49.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Mossiere, A., Maeder, E.M., &amp; Pica, E. (2016). Racial composition of couples in battered spouse syndrome cases: A look at juror perceptions and decisions. J<em>ournal of Interpersonal Violence.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., Ewanation, L., &amp; Monnink, J. (2016). Jurors\u2019 perceptions of evidence: DNA vs. eyewitness testimony when presented by opposing parties. <em>Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology,\u00a0<\/em><em>32(1)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., Yamamoto, S., McManus, L., &amp; Capaldi, C. (2016). Race-crime congruency in the Canadian context. <em>Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 48<\/em>, 162-170.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (2015). Culture in the courtroom: Ethnocentrism and juror decision-making. <em>PLoS One<\/em>. doi: 10.1371\/journal.pone.0137799<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., Yamamoto, S., &amp; McManus, L. (2015). Race salience in \u00a0Canada: Testing multiple manipulations and target races. <em>Psychology, Public Policy, and Law<\/em>. doi: 10.1037\/law0000057<\/p>\n<p>Yamamoto, S., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2015). A case of culture: Defendant gender and juror decision-making. <em>Journal of Interpersonal Violence<\/em>.\u00a0 doi:10.1177\/0886260515596976<\/p>\n<p>Mossiere, A., &amp; Maeder, E.M. (2015). Exploring attitudes toward mental illness as an influential factor in juror decision-making: A comparison of sample types. <em>International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.<\/em>\u00a0 doi:10.1016\/j.ijlp.2015.08.008<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., Yamamoto, S., &amp; Fenwick, K. (2015). Educating Canadian jurors about the Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder defence. <em>Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 47<\/em>, 226-235.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; Corbett, R. (2015). Beyond frequency: Perceived realism and the CSI effect. <em>Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 57<\/em>, 83-114.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., Yamamoto, S., &amp; Saliba, P. (2015). The influence of \u00a0defendant race and victim physical attractiveness on juror decision-making in a sexual assault trial.\u00a0<em>Psychology, Crime, and Law, 21<\/em>, 62- \u00a079.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; Pica, E. (2014). Secondary confessions: The influence of incentive size and scientific expert testimony.\u00a0<em>Law &amp; Human Behavior, 38<\/em>, 560-568.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; Dempsey, J. (2013). A likely story? The influence of type of alibi and defendant gender on juror decision-making. <em>Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 20<\/em>, 543-552.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., &amp; Burdett, J. (2013). The combined influence of defendant race and gang affiliation on mock juror decision-making. <em>Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 20<\/em>, 188-201.<\/p>\n<p>Maeder, E.M., Mossiere, A., &amp; Cheung, L. (2013). Canadian mock juror attitudes and decisions in domestic violence cases involving Asian and White interracial and intraracial couples.\u00a0<em>Journal of \u00a0Interpersonal Violence, 28<\/em>, 667-682.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ewanation, L., Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (in press). Mock juror decision-making in a self-defence trial involving police use of force. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. Maeder, E.M., &amp; McManus, L. (in press).\u00a0 Mosaic or melting pot?: Race and juror decision-making in Canada and the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Ewanation, L., &amp; Maeder, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Publications - Legal Decision Making<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Ewanation, L., Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (in press). Mock juror decision-making in a self-defence trial involving police use of force. Canadian\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/\",\"name\":\"Publications - Legal Decision Making\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-17T15:49:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-10-15T03:19:52+00:00\",\"description\":\"Ewanation, L., Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (in press). Mock juror decision-making in a self-defence trial involving police use of force. Canadian\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Publications\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Decision Making\",\"description\":\"Carleton University\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Publications - Legal Decision Making","description":"Ewanation, L., Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (in press). Mock juror decision-making in a self-defence trial involving police use of force. Canadian","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/","url":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/","name":"Publications - Legal Decision Making","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-05-17T15:49:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-10-15T03:19:52+00:00","description":"Ewanation, L., Maeder, E.M., &amp; Yamamoto, S. (in press). Mock juror decision-making in a self-defence trial involving police use of force. Canadian","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/publications\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Publications"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/#website","url":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/","name":"Legal Decision Making","description":"Carleton University","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"acf":{"banner_image_type":"none","banner_button":"no"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/141"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=141"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/141\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":356,"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/141\/revisions\/356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/carleton.ca\/legaldecisionmaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}