Moments after the final polls closed in the 2016 American election there was a pervading sense that our world, as we understood it, had changed.

With the GOP’s victory, the veil of Western democracy was pulled back to reveal a jolting truth that, in the 21st century, a developed nation can elect a man like Donald Trump as a state leader.

It has been nearly a year since Trump sat down in the Oval Office and the fervency of the cultural zeitgeist increases in temperature with every dog whistle tweet, blasé presidential press conference, or scandalous press leak. People shout at one another on social media and columnists beg their audiences to open their eyes to the unprecedented nature of this administration and what it portends for democracy.

Despite the exhaustive coverage, there exists a prevalent collective fog as citizens try to wrap their heads around our newfangled and truly confusing political reality.

With her crowdsourced project, The New Fascism Syllabus: Exploring the New Right Through Scholarship and Civic Engagement, Professor Jennifer Evans implements history as a tool to help understand the right-wing insurgency on real-time display in America. She’ll teach it in her Populism in History course next Winter here at Carleton.

Jennifer Evans

Professor Jennifer Evans, History

Evans developed The New Fascism Syllabus alongside her colleague Lisa Heineman at the University of Iowa and with the help of graduate students Meghan Lundrigan (Carleton University) and Brian Griffith (University of California, Santa Barbara). The group intends to accumulate and curate books, academic journal articles, and news features on the authoritarian turn in 20th and 21st century history.

“We began pulling it together in the immediate days after the American election. What we found was there was an overwhelming plea in social media and the regular press for facts and historical context.”

“How could this have happened, what does it mean, and what lessons might history provide for how such a presidency might unfold?” asked Prof. Evans.

“These questions guided us in assembling the best of new writing on what we might call the authoritarian turn in global politics these last years, as well as the historiography on past fascist and populist regimes.”

Given their roles as public intellectuals, Evans and Heineman felt an obligation to provide a resource for how to think critically about authoritarian regimes. “Universities are the best place to have these discussions because at their heart they are places of inspection, analysis, and learning,” explained Evans, but they also understand the prudency to relay their knowledge into the hands of the wider public and journalists who are shaping the debate.

They aspire to offer important information to those everyday people seeking more than what traditional media offers. “Our syllabus, we felt, would be a bridge between the worlds of academia and the public sphere,” said Evans.

The New Fascism Syllabus

Screenshot of the New Fascism Syllabus Website

A Crowdsourced Syllabus

As described by Evans, The New Fascism Syllabus is the open and accessible product of conversations held online, on Twitter and Facebook, among scholars the world over and interested people outside of the realm of the academy.

Evans and Heineman developed a structure to guide the readings which

offers

weekly themes focused mostly on regions around the world. Once an area of inquiry is established, they asked contributors for their top three source suggestions based on the quality and accessibility of the arguments. Contributors were reminded that these references might serve as introductions to the history of a region for a journalist working on a particular story or theme.

“This resulted in lists of sources old and new, classics as well as newly penned. The Facebook group of discussants was especially vocal; experts debated the merits of certain texts. The result was an array of first-person accounts, films, and analytical works on the history of populism and fascism worldwide,” said Evans.

When asked if the recent global rise in right and alt-right movements around the world — the election of Trump, Brexit, the populism of Le Pen in France, and the popularity of The Rebel Media in Canada — is something we could have seen coming, Professor Evans retorted, “Historians don’t like to predict! We leave that to political scientists and their models.”

“But seriously, where history does come to bear is in thinking about past practices, how the civil service, or the judiciary, or even the military functioned under parallel circumstances. And historians might also weigh in on what we now refer to as “toxic masculinity,” migration, the economic downturn, neo-liberal policies, and networked society as having some role in shaping the current state of play,” she explained.

This, of course, begs the question, which past circumstances do historians suspect might possess a semblance to the current socio-political climate?

Front Cover of the New Statesman, November 2016 (Photo Credit)

Credit: Front Cover of the New Statesman, November 2016

“Historians see long and short-term indicators at work explaining today’s events. Depending on one’s expertise, one might see long-term indicators as the rise of the neo-liberal state and policies of austerity for draining people’s confidence in traditional authority.”

“The European elections and shift to the center-right have shown people tend to vote for more ultra-conservative parties not always out of fear or xenophobia, but for economic concerns, fears around pensions, and the medical system. Short-term causes — to an historian — might also include the post-Cold War playing field, the migration crisis, the lack of historical reckoning in some states with the full scale of Nazi crimes and a nation’s own complicity in supporting aspects of this regime,” asserted Evans.

From a Western perspective, the notion of fascism, populism, and authoritarianism, until recently, seemed like expired, unassuming threats. These were weighty markers that were scarcely written by reporters unless referring to some solemn historical event. Today, they are almost inescapable when catching up on the daily news.

“History teaches us to be careful of how terms are used,” cautioned Evans. “It is one reason we labelled our syllabus this way: to spur discussion about the differences between populist, fascist, and authoritarian regimes and how they work.”

“History also shows us how authority and power manifest, how dissent is quashed or limited, and the forms opposition might take. We know from the German Jewish language scholar Victor Klemperer that language is a source of legitimacy for authoritarian rulers. Words have meaning. Nothing may be taken as benign. From this, we can learn to prick up our ears when confronted with what at first might appear as banal. Critical self-awareness is one of the most important lessons of History.”

Having written and edited a number of books which confront the aftermath of National Socialism in Europe, including Life Among the Ruins: Cityscape and Sexuality in Cold War Berlin (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), Queer Cities, Queer Cultures: Europe Since 1945 (co-edited w/ Matt Cook, Continuum, 2013), and currently working on a book titled, Holocaust Memory in the Digital Mediascape, co-written with Erica Fagen and Meghan Lundrigan. (Bloomsbury, in preparation), Evans is well versed in decrypting ultra-conservative codes and patterns. She is quick to proclaim that “these values seeped into everyday life, sometimes even after the demise of the regime.”

Her work as a German historian explores how law codes formulated during the Nazi period remained relevant in the postwar arena, suggesting that liberalization was a process hard fought and won through the work of tireless jurists, academics, doctors and citizens who organized in different ways at different moments in the past to confront this challenge.

For perspective Evans reminds us that “Germany only issued a formal apology to the Nazi persecution of gay men in the early 2000s, and only last year offered compensation to queer victims. This is a story that needs telling because it teaches us to never take victories for granted.”

Much of Evans’ research focuses on the on the history of sexuality and sexual revolutions, and she does see an existing correlation between the study of fascism and sexuality. “The history of sexuality, as a field, looks at the gendered ways in which power is shaped.”

“This is a vital lens for understanding the appeal of the far right, whether it is the role of young, disaffected college students seeking the homosocial bonds of alt-right groups intent on unmaking multiculturalism or the spread of moral panics in Europe and unfounded claims of increased sexual crime to garner mass opposition to the presence of migrants in places like Germany.”

“A focus on sexuality, on what a particular group claims is normal, desired, traditional, or dangerous allows us to see how these groups create insider and outsider groups to mobilize support among their base,” said Evans.

In Evans’ career as a researcher, her projects have always focused on what people can and are doing to counter the spread of hateful ideas. In recent years, much of her time has spent analyzing the role of social media as a series of platforms where people might raise consciousness, hone organizational skills, acquire and spread knowledge, and come together in virtual and later in real communities to voice outrage and opposition to these groups. She maintains that “the symbols people choose to help make their point, the rhetoric, the appeal to history — all these cultural iconographies are important pieces of the puzzle, and they need to be interrogated critically.”

The New Fascism Syllabus aspires to equip students to become thought leaders in this arena, as it will provide a global, comparative, perspective on the 20th and early 21st century.

“It arms students with the best scholarship to help navigate past and present challenges to democracy and the diverse ways in which people tried to push back.”

The syllabus, by its very make up, is an affirmation of the power of scholarship and collaboration to tackle the difficult subjects.

As explained by Evans, “The New Fascism Syllabus is a statement of the importance of informed conversation in understanding a confusing historical moment.”

Read more on the Syllabus: http://www.thehistoryinquestion.com/


Banner Photo Credit: ThroughtfulReading.com

8 thoughts on “Studying History to Take On the New Fascism with Prof. Jennifer Evans”

  1. Kevin Fulsom says:

    How about we don’t post overly politicized garbage on here? The New Fascism? Give me a break. The left marches around acting like Red Guards from Maoist China and you seriously whine about the “right” who only wants to maintain some semblance of order, sanity and historical continuity. This is how devolved and decedent our society has become. If history shows us anything it is that western society is in end times where its own population has been mobilized against itself.

    1. Vanessa says:

      I’m curious. By “historical continuity”, are you referring to genocide, slavery, colonialism, conquest, the usurpation of power to exploit natural landscapes and resources, and the historical continuity of -isms such as sexism, anti-Semitism, racism, and more?

  2. Steve says:

    How can Carleton University, an Institution that prides itself on free thinking and a place where young adults are supposed to form opinions on their own, can come out with such a twisted and politically biased course? Instead of asking students to think for themselves you are literally teaching the students a biased view that fits your political agenda. Leave identity politics out of school and let people think for themselves.

    1. Vanessa says:

      If white nationalist supremacists have a place under the claim to “free speech” at academic institutions, then so does a professor who wants to discuss the real and tangible effects of the new political establishment.

  3. Chip Berlet says:

    The New Fascism Syllabus is of great use to me as a journalist and a scholar. I have been studying right-wing social and political movements for over 30 years, and have written essays for daily newspapers and articles in academic books and journals. And yet the New Fascism Syllabus continuously amazes me with materials of which I had been unaware, and points of view that teach me that although nearing 70 years of age I am never too old to learn.

  4. Geoff Read says:

    Critics of this don’t understand how academic freedom works. I am doing a mini-version of the same thing next year and will definitely be drawing on the invaluable resources that this project has brought together. It is crucial to understand the relevant History of if you want to grasp where Trumpism comes from.

  5. Dr. Waitman Wade Beorn says:

    The New Fascism Syllabus is a balanced, well-thought out, and detailed way for scholars to approach issues of fascism in the classroom. It was crowdsourced by eminent scholars to be incredibly inclusive.

    Moreover, it has no political agenda; rather, it responds to the very resurgence of fascism and white supremacy. I teach at UVA in Charlottesville so I need no one to describe this as “identity politics” or a “biased view.” I live where real biased views literally killed a woman.

    This work is an excellent example of how academics can connect current events with the past WITHOUT politicizing them. The syllabus provides balanced readings. It certainly does not censor or preclude vibrant discussions in the classroom.

    Those dismissing this admirable effort would do well to read some of this history presented before commenting on this presentation of history.

  6. Geoffrey Megargee says:

    As a historian at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, I can only applaud Prof. Evans’s efforts to educate the public about threatening trends in our society and politics. I am only sorry that such an effort is necessary.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *