The Weaponization of Narratives: Disinformation and Media Framing of the Trump-Putin Talks and Their Impact on Ukraine
Author: Albina Holokhvastova
Trump’s recent shift away from supporting Ukraine has led to the country’s exclusion from the latest peace negotiations aimed at ending the war. This development shows the importance of narratives as strategic guidelines and the impact that their weaponization can have on major policy decisions.
In today’s geopolitical landscape, narratives are not just stories; they are strategic tools that shape public opinion and guide strategic policies. Both government and non-government actors play a critical role in the development and promotion of these narratives by selectively presenting information in a way that supports their position. This is the essence of the weaponization of narratives.
The dramatic shift in US support for Ukraine under the new Trump administration illustrates how narratives have real effects on major policy decisions. In this case, the shift from US support for Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression to adopting a more ambiguous position on the causes of the war have led to the exclusion of Ukraine in peace talks between the US and Russia.
In Ukraine, government officials and independent media, including The Kyiv Independent, have condemned Ukraine’s exclusion from these talks. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has warned that any pathway to peace conducted without Ukraine’s direct involvement is unacceptable, emphasizing that Ukraine must be at the forefront of any negotiations, declaring “nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.” Without Ukraine at the negotiation table, any settlements reached could result in a disadvantageous ceasefire, leaving Ukraine vulnerable to further concessions that may compromise its national security and territorial integrity. Ukraine’s position in the war has been undercut by the United States’ narrative shift from Biden to Trump and could result in real effects on Ukrainian sovereignty and security if it does not gain a seat at the negotiating table.
Conversely, Russian state media, particularly Russia Today (RT), has praised Trump’s narrative and has framed the talks as a diplomatic victory. The Kremlin’s own narrative portray NATO and Ukraine as the aggressors in the war, claiming that it was forced to act against this aggression in order to defend Russian minority groups in Ukraine. The exclusion of Ukraine and European NATO Allies from the peace talks, as well as Trump’s recent comments labelling Zelenskyy as a “dictator” serve to legitimize Russia’s narrative and reinforce its position by portraying Western security commitments as provocative rather than stabilizing. By lending support to Russia’s narrative, the United States could embolden Russia to continue its aggressive actions in Eastern Europe, thus bringing about new challenges for NATO in its ability to uphold European security.
Across the NATO Alliance and in Canada in particular, various government and media outlets have raised alarms over Trump’s ambiguous stance toward Putin, warning that it undermines the cohesion of Western security policies and weakens the moral clarity needed to confront Russian aggression. The framing of these discussions continues to evolve with broader concerns about foreign interference and disinformation. Canadian media, particularly Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, has also framed the peace talks alongside broader concerns about foreign interference and disinformation. As a result, Canada has expressed its commitment to safeguarding its information space and upholding democratic institutions.
The US-Russia peace talks demonstrate how a weaponization of narratives can result in real changes to the outcomes of a conflict. These developments also show the importance of information warfare in modern conflict.