undefined - Technology Innovation Management

Survey Feedback on the Guide to Producing Scoping Reviews Using AI Tools

Thank you for using the Guide to Producing Scoping Reviews Using AI Tools. This survey aims to gather your feedback to improve the Guide for Carleton University faculty and students. Your responses will remain anonymous and will be used solely to enhance the Guide. The survey takes approximately 10-15 minutes to complete.

Role

If Other, please specify:

Department or Program

If Other, please specify:

Experience with Scoping Reviews:

None

Beginner (1-2 reviews)

Intermediate (3-5 reviews)

Advanced (more than 5 reviews)

General Feedback on the Guide

Please rate the following statements on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is “Strongly Disagree” and 5 is “Strongly Agree.”

The Guide is easy to understand and follow.

The Guide provides clear instructions on using AI tools for scoping reviews.

The examples provided in the Guide are relevant to my research needs.

The Guide adequately addresses ethical considerations when using AI tools.

The visual aids (e.g., concept maps, tables) in the Guide are helpful.

The Guide is well-organized and easy to navigate.

Feedback on Specific Steps in the Guide

For each step of the scoping review process outlined in the Guide, please indicate how helpful the Guide was in guiding you. Use a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is “Not Helpful” and 5 is “Very Helpful.”

Step 1: Formulate the Review Question and Scope

Step 2: Search for Articles

Step 3: Select Articles

Step 4: Extract Data

Step 5: Analyze and Synthesize Data

Step 6: Interpret Results

Step 7: Write the Scoping Review

Step 8: Incorporate Ethical Considerations

Step 9: Disseminate Findings

AI Tools and Human Oversight

Please rate the following statements on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is “Strongly Disagree” and 5 is “Strongly Agree.”

The Guide effectively explains how to balance AI assistance with human judgment.

I feel confident in my ability to critically evaluate AI-generated outputs after using the Guide.

The Guide provides sufficient guidance on verifying AI-generated citations and summaries.

I understand the ethical implications of using AI tools in my research, as explained in the Guide.

Impact of the Guide

Please rate the following statements on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is “Strongly Disagree” and 5 is “Strongly Agree.”

The Guide has improved my efficiency in conducting scoping reviews.

The Guide has enhanced the quality of my scoping reviews.

The Guide has helped me produce more comprehensive literature reviews.

I am likely to use the Guide in future research projects.

Open-Ended Feedback

What did you find most helpful about the Guide?

What aspects of the Guide could be improved?

Are there any specific examples or use cases you would like to see added to the Guide?

Do you have any suggestions for additional AI tools or resources that should be included in the Guide?

What challenges or barriers did you face when using the Guide or the recommended AI tools?

Would you be open to a follow-up conversation or email to provide more detailed feedback? If yes, please leave your contact email below: (Optional)

CAPTCHA