Photo of Evelyn Maeder

Evelyn Maeder

Professor / Undergraduate Supervisor

Degrees:Ph.D. (Psychology), University of Nebraska-Lincoln; M.L.S. (Master’s of Legal Studies), University of Nebraska Lincoln College of Law; M.A. (Psychology), University of Nebraska-Lincoln; B.A.Hon. (Psychology), University of Regina
Phone:613-520-2600 x 2421
Office:C566 Loeb

Research Interests

  • Discrimination in the law
  • Legal decision-making
  • The influence of race, gender, and other extralegal information on juror decision-making
  • The Not Criminally Responsible by Reason of Mental Disorder (NCRMD) defence – effects of education, attitudes toward mental illness, and punishment orientation on jurors’ decisions


Dr. Maeder became a faculty member of the Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice in 2008.  She is also cross-appointed in the Department of Psychology and the Department of Law and Legal Studies. Dr. Maeder studies the role of psychology in the law and legal decision-making, particularly with respect to juries.  Her current research projects include studying the effects of extralegal information (e.g., race and racialization, gender, and pre-existing attitudes) on juror and jury decision-making, legal decision-making in NCRMD trials, and lay conceptions of punishment.  She is the director of the Legal Decision-Making Lab at Carleton, and her work has been funded by SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada) and APLS (American Psychology-Law Society).

Recent Publications

Ewanation, L., Maeder, E.M., & Yamamoto, S. (in press). Mock juror decision-making in a self-defence trial involving police use of force. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science.

Maeder, E.M., & McManus, L. (2022).  Mosaic or melting pot?: Race and juror decision-making in Canada and the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37, 991-1012.

Ewanation, L., & Maeder, E.M. (2021). The interactive effects of race and expert testimony on jurors’ perceptions of recanted confessions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 699077.

Yamamoto, S., & Maeder, E.M. (2021).  What’s in the box?: Punishment and insanity in the Canadian jury deliberation room.  Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2442.

Maeder, E.M., Yamamoto, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2020).  The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity defence trials.  International Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 68, 101536.

Maeder, E.M., & Yamamoto, S. (2019).  Social Identity Theory in the Canadian courtroom:  Effects of juror and defendant race. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 61, 24-44.

Yamamoto, S., Maeder, E.M., Mossiere, A., & Brown, D. (2019).  The influence of defendant body size and defendant gender on mock juror decision-making. Cogent Psychology, 6, 1674091.

Yamamoto, S., & Maeder, E.M. (2019). Creating and validating a measure of punishment orientation.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 1283-1294.

Maeder, E.M., & Yamamoto, S. (2019).  Investigating race salience, defendant race, and victim race on juror decision-making in Canada.  Justice Quarterly, 36 (5), 929-953.

Maeder, E.M., & Ewanation, L. (2018).  What makes race salient?: Juror decision-making in same-race vs. cross-race identification scenarios and the influence of expert testimony.  Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(8), 1234-1251.

Ewanation, L., & Maeder, E.M. (2018).  The influence of eyewitness intoxication, eyewitness race, and defendant race on mock juror decision-making. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60, 505-536.

Mossiere, A., Maeder, E.M., & Pica, E. (2018).  Racial composition of couples in battered spouse syndrome cases: A look at juror perceptions and decisions.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(18), 2867-2890.

Maeder, E.M., Yamamoto, S., & McManus, L.A. (2018).  Methodology matters: Comparing sample types and data collection methods in a juror decision-making study on the influence of defendant race.  Psychology, Crime, and Law, 24, 687-702.

McManus, L., Maeder, E.M., & Yamamoto, S. (2018).  The role of defendant race and racially charged media in Canadian mock juror decision making. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60(2), 266-295.

Maeder, E.M., McManus, L., Yamamoto, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2018).  A test of gender-crime congruency on mock juror decision-making. Cogent Psychology, 5(1), 1461543.

Yamamoto, S., Fenwick, K., & Maeder, E.M. (2017).  Criminal responsibility in Canada: Mental illness stigma education and the insanity defense.  International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(4), 313-335.

Yamamoto, S., & Maeder, E.M. (2017).  A case of culture: Defendant gender and juror decision-making.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(20), 3090-3110.  doi:10.1177/0886260515596976

Yamamoto, S., & Maeder, E.M. (2017).  Defendant and juror race in a necessity case: An ultimate attribution error.  Journal of Ethnicity and Criminal Justice, 15(3), 270-284.

Maeder, E.M., & Yamamoto, S. (2017).  Attributions in the courtroom: The influence of race, incentive, and witness type on jurors’ perceptions of secondary confessions.  Psychology, Crime, & Law, 23, 361-375.

Ewanation, L., Yamamoto, S., Monnink, J., & Maeder, E.M. (2017).  Perceived realism and the CSI Effect.  Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1294446.

Maeder, E.M., Ewanation, L., & Monnink, J. (2017).  Jurors’ perceptions of evidence: DNA vs. eyewitness testimony.  Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32, 33-42.